Third Security
In the past, I’ve expressed my distaste for the venture capitalists in Southwest Virginia and in some of my ramblings, I have mentioned Third Security specifically (to their credit, they are the only venture firm left that I know of that is doing any deals at all these days—the other ones are pretty well entrenched with their portfolio companies and I count my lucky stars that I’m not one of those businesses). I’ve blogged before about why I think the region is struggling and how I believe the local investment community is going to have to be a little more open with the entrepreneurs, CEOs, and business owners in the area, among other things. Since I posted that, I’ve had a great response from several members of the community (there was a little backlash too) but I still never had any interaction with anyone from Third Security—until recently. I bumped into Matt Crisp, one of their business development guys at a wine festival a few weeks ago. It turns out he is a really cool dude—who would have thought? :-)
Matt and I had a great conversation followed up by lunch last week. I explained to Matt that my issues with Third Security don’t have anything to do with their hard-nosed investment philosophy—I respect them very much for that. My issues are:
1. As a Virginia Tech graduate and local entrepreneur, it pains me to see the Virginia Tech Foundation investing in a venture fund that I know isn’t going to make many investments (they’ve only done one small deal in 17 months)—and especially one that isn’t going to pay any attention to my company, my market or the Internet in general. As a future donor to the Virginia Tech Foundation (and I know several others very well), I think I at least have the right to express my opinion.
The press release from this fund states that:
As part of their commitment to regional economic development, Carilion Health System and the Virginia Tech Foundation have established a private equity/venture capital fund and an investment consortium that will make investments in promising companies willing to initiate operations or relocate their business to the Roanoke and New River Valleys.
Very cool at face value. Not very cool in reality.
2. I don’t love how Third Security shows up to technology and entrepreneurial events (every now and again) to express their support for the community and local economic development. If this were anything other than bullshit, it wouldn’t bother me—in fact, I would embrace it.
Those are my own personal opinions. Take them however you like.
On the contrary, I think that Third Security (and most venture capital firms) gets a bad rap because people forget what their job really is—to make money for their investors, bottom line. I give a lot of credit to Third Security in this regard. They know exactly the types of deals they go after (mostly bio-tech stuff that is way over my head) and they stick to what they’re good at. At the end of the day, they’re very smart business people and great at what they do—that simply cannot be disputed. Smart people, great at what they do, bad reputation—sounds to me like they should start a blog. Seriously.
My hope for Third Security (being a local venture firm) is that they do take more of a proactive interest in the community. I’d love for any of the VCs in this area to get more involved with the entrepreneurs and businesspeople. I think that is a key ingredient to the future successes of this area—and that, I care a lot about.